Mowgli Posted September 9, 2005 Share Posted September 9, 2005 the juggles in kentaro's '97 set were undoubtedly ahead of their time in terms of speed and accuracy but they sounded ugly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Menace Posted September 9, 2005 Share Posted September 9, 2005 I've been learning in 24's but im only up to 6, figure that out Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mowgli Posted September 9, 2005 Share Posted September 9, 2005 steve told me i'm 11. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blak Randy Posted September 9, 2005 Share Posted September 9, 2005 I've been learning in 24's but im only up to 6, figure that out<{POST_SNAPBACK}> You dear sir, are a liar. That is impossible. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
x2k Posted September 9, 2005 Share Posted September 9, 2005 Maybe I judge juggles differently to eveybody else. Kentaro's juggles (at least the one's I've heard) sound horrible, like that one somebody posted on here with all the mirrors. Perhaps I just expect too much from turntablism when it has in all truth very little to offer to the world of music. pz<{POST_SNAPBACK}> I think there's 2 sorts of juggles, the one you do for a club full off pissed people in a club are there to fall about in time with a 4/4 beat at a single pace. Then on the other hand you got more complex juggles which aren't bound by a single time signature or tempo and is more a piece of art or food for thought. A really bad comparison might be the difference between a bit of dance music and piece of classical music or jazz (it's a bad comparison but I think it sort of fits). Anyway, fuck knows if anyone else agrees with me but thats my approach to working out a juggle. I come up with something complex and really sick (by my standards) but know it's never gonna be used for rocking a crown in a club. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Menace Posted September 9, 2005 Share Posted September 9, 2005 Not if you divide the subroot by 3.5 then pie x4, then subtract the denominator. then it works out pretty much. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
x2k Posted September 9, 2005 Share Posted September 9, 2005 Not if you divide the subroot by 3.5 then pie x4, then subtract the denominator. then it works out pretty much.<{POST_SNAPBACK}> What the fuck are you on about???? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
muzzell Posted September 9, 2005 Share Posted September 9, 2005 Fuck man... Ive only just seen how yogafrog got that infamous "turbo scratch", 3 over 5, Staring me right in the face! check out 13 over 6s (looks like a prism to me) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Menace Posted September 9, 2005 Share Posted September 9, 2005 Not if you divide the subroot by 3.5 then pie x4, then subtract the denominator. then it works out pretty much.<{POST_SNAPBACK}> What the fuck are you on about????<{POST_SNAPBACK}> Simple mathematics, thought you knew? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mowgli Posted September 9, 2005 Share Posted September 9, 2005 hey x2k...i think it's reezy lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Menace Posted September 9, 2005 Share Posted September 9, 2005 Who is reezy, this is Mike menace from UK Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Menace Posted September 9, 2005 Share Posted September 9, 2005 AKA Mick menny Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blak Randy Posted September 9, 2005 Share Posted September 9, 2005 Not if you divide the subroot by 3.5 then pie x4, then subtract the denominator. then it works out pretty much.<{POST_SNAPBACK}> Although that looks like you are taking the piss I can now see where you are coming from. Genius. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mowgli Posted September 9, 2005 Share Posted September 9, 2005 Fuck man... Ive only just seen how yogafrog got that infamous "turbo scratch", 3 over 5, Staring me right in the face! check out 13 over 6s (looks like a prism to me)<{POST_SNAPBACK}> i thought prisms had to be divisible by 8 ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nimrod Posted September 9, 2005 Share Posted September 9, 2005 Fuck man... Ive only just seen how yogafrog got that infamous "turbo scratch", 3 over 5, Staring me right in the face! check out 13 over 6s (looks like a prism to me)<{POST_SNAPBACK}> i thought prisms had to be divisible by 8 ?<{POST_SNAPBACK}> from what ive gathered, prisms are the exception to the rule. BUT only when used in conjunction with inverse 7 over 6s (2 click tear flare). this would take you up to 30ish i would imagine, but im new to this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blak Randy Posted September 9, 2005 Share Posted September 9, 2005 Fuck man... Ive only just seen how yogafrog got that infamous "turbo scratch", 3 over 5, Staring me right in the face! check out 13 over 6s (looks like a prism to me)<{POST_SNAPBACK}> i thought prisms had to be divisible by 8 ?<{POST_SNAPBACK}> from what ive gathered, prisms are the exception to the rule. BUT only when used in conjunction with inverse 7 over 6s (2 click tear flare). this would take you up to 30ish i would imagine, but im new to this.<{POST_SNAPBACK}> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt Posted September 9, 2005 Share Posted September 9, 2005 this is the greatest thread in scratch history since melo-d dissed nicks for being a cock monkey Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Posted September 9, 2005 Share Posted September 9, 2005 Melo-D dissed Nicks? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cbay Posted September 9, 2005 Share Posted September 9, 2005 Melo-D dissed Nicks?<{POST_SNAPBACK}> when? where? post a file? lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
muzzell Posted September 9, 2005 Share Posted September 9, 2005 Fuck man... Ive only just seen how yogafrog got that infamous "turbo scratch", 3 over 5, Staring me right in the face! check out 13 over 6s (looks like a prism to me)<{POST_SNAPBACK}> i thought prisms had to be divisible by 8 ?<{POST_SNAPBACK}> NO frd bak bak frd frd bak = 6 moves, with a 2clicker (in transform style over the top) or 2 click flare. That is the reg prism that Q-Bert and others do. The system doesnt work like that anyway, its... 13 over 6s. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cable Posted September 9, 2005 Share Posted September 9, 2005 What fucking shitting hell are you bollock monkeys on about? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
muzzell Posted September 9, 2005 Share Posted September 9, 2005 you know what a prism is yer? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ugly Boner Rivers Posted September 9, 2005 Share Posted September 9, 2005 this thread is fun... but i dont get it... i'll just keep scratchin Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blak Randy Posted September 9, 2005 Share Posted September 9, 2005 Muzz. Can you work in 4 then say at 12 flip your style to 3's to get to 15. Hard shit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
muzzell Posted September 9, 2005 Share Posted September 9, 2005 Im not sure if someone is taking the piss or not? Im off to 69 dude Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.