Ryan Posted January 27, 2009 Share Posted January 27, 2009 ..but made it out to be alot more complicated in my h33d.Trick is use the tip of the sample to eliminate the back wards sound of the chirp so the fader motion doesn't change at all. Just the record placement if that makes sense?I only caught on to this a few minutes ago. so its a very basic example. Will post more when i get the swing of it. I can hear some str8 fonky patterns for this one. >>>Click Here You Dumb Mawtherfucker<< Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blak Randy Posted January 27, 2009 Share Posted January 27, 2009 Funkkkkky. I'm Biting. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
djdiggla Posted January 27, 2009 Share Posted January 27, 2009 Nice man. defo gonna try this out Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Dongbot Posted January 27, 2009 Share Posted January 27, 2009 ..but made it out to be alot more complicated in my h33d.Trick is use the tip of the sample to eliminate the back wards sound of the chirp so the fader motion doesn't change at all. Just the record placement if that makes sense?I only caught on to this a few minutes ago. so its a very basic example. Will post more when i get the swing of it. I can hear some str8 fonky patterns for this one. >>>Click Here You Dumb Mawtherfucker<< sounds nice but you explained it like a cunt.. post a vid you fumb duck!!! x Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan Posted January 27, 2009 Author Share Posted January 27, 2009 ..but made it out to be alot more complicated in my h33d.Trick is use the tip of the sample to eliminate the back wards sound of the chirp so the fader motion doesn't change at all. Just the record placement if that makes sense?I only caught on to this a few minutes ago. so its a very basic example. Will post more when i get the swing of it. I can hear some str8 fonky patterns for this one. >>>Click Here You Dumb Mawtherfucker<< sounds nice but you explained it like a cunt.. post a vid you fumb duck!!! x I can't explain scratches (as you can see) don't know why i bothered trying Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
juse box Posted January 27, 2009 Share Posted January 27, 2009 sick, im biting as soon as im back to my tables in october! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chuckjl Posted January 28, 2009 Share Posted January 28, 2009 nice idea Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
djfoly Posted January 28, 2009 Share Posted January 28, 2009 I like this! I think you should do a video though! and I will also bite this big time! Nice work Ryan! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnny 1 move Posted January 28, 2009 Share Posted January 28, 2009 ..but made it out to be alot more complicated in my h33d.Trick is use the tip of the sample to eliminate the back wards sound of the chirp so the fader motion doesn't change at all. Just the record placement if that makes sense?I only caught on to this a few minutes ago. so its a very basic example. Will post more when i get the swing of it. I can hear some str8 fonky patterns for this one. >>>Click Here You Dumb Mawtherfucker<< If you're doing what I think you're doing then I do them by chirping with the wrist, then to get the stab I let my fingers come off the fader more at the end of the forwards bit of the chirp so that backstroke of the chirp isn't heard (I'm regular not hamster). So it's really a chirp with a delayed open of the fader on the backstroke, so if you only use the very start of the sound you don't hear the backstroke... Is that what you're doing? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gutter Posted January 29, 2009 Share Posted January 29, 2009 Can you upload the beat? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
x2k Posted January 29, 2009 Share Posted January 29, 2009 I think this is the cut Adam showed but a while back...n00b! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan Posted January 29, 2009 Author Share Posted January 29, 2009 I think this is the cut Adam showed but a while back...n00b! Really? Things like this happen to me all the time. I thought i invented the delayed 2clicker, scratch drumming, and sticker looping. Not to say i never expected anybody to have combo'd chirps with stabs. I was just giving my variation of it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan Posted January 29, 2009 Author Share Posted January 29, 2009 ..but made it out to be alot more complicated in my h33d.Trick is use the tip of the sample to eliminate the back wards sound of the chirp so the fader motion doesn't change at all. Just the record placement if that makes sense?I only caught on to this a few minutes ago. so its a very basic example. Will post more when i get the swing of it. I can hear some str8 fonky patterns for this one. >>>Click Here You Dumb Mawtherfucker<< If you're doing what I think you're doing then I do them by chirping with the wrist, then to get the stab I let my fingers come off the fader more at the end of the forwards bit of the chirp so that backstroke of the chirp isn't heard (I'm regular not hamster). So it's really a chirp with a delayed open of the fader on the backstroke, so if you only use the very start of the sound you don't hear the backstroke... Is that what you're doing? I'm not sure i understand what you typed. But i don't think thats what i'm doing. To be honest though. the more i try it out and listen back, it kinda just sounds like someone not catching chirps properly hah.. Can you upload the beat? No. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnny 1 move Posted January 29, 2009 Share Posted January 29, 2009 ..but made it out to be alot more complicated in my h33d.Trick is use the tip of the sample to eliminate the back wards sound of the chirp so the fader motion doesn't change at all. Just the record placement if that makes sense?I only caught on to this a few minutes ago. so its a very basic example. Will post more when i get the swing of it. I can hear some str8 fonky patterns for this one. >>>Click Here You Dumb Mawtherfucker<< If you're doing what I think you're doing then I do them by chirping with the wrist, then to get the stab I let my fingers come off the fader more at the end of the forwards bit of the chirp so that backstroke of the chirp isn't heard (I'm regular not hamster). So it's really a chirp with a delayed open of the fader on the backstroke, so if you only use the very start of the sound you don't hear the backstroke... Is that what you're doing? I'm not sure i understand what you typed. But i don't think thats what i'm doing. To be honest though. the more i try it out and listen back, it kinda just sounds like someone not catching chirps properly hah.. I think you're just keeping the fader close for the backstroke of the chirp.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan Posted January 29, 2009 Author Share Posted January 29, 2009 I think you're just keeping the fader close for the backstroke of the chirp.... naw leaving it open. Kinda like a faderless stab. Using some of the dead space between the beep and the start of the ahh to get only one sound. Make sense? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnny 1 move Posted January 29, 2009 Share Posted January 29, 2009 I think you're just keeping the fader close for the backstroke of the chirp.... naw leaving it open. Kinda like a faderless stab. Using some of the dead space between the beep and the start of the ahh to get only one sound. Make sense? Hmmm - don't get you.... If you push forward from dead space into the ahh, you need to do something to stop the backwards sound... Pulling back from the sound back into the deadspace will still make a sound... just a shorter one :s Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bubba Posted January 29, 2009 Share Posted January 29, 2009 Dude, you got bernie back into cutting aswell? NIce combo. pee.z Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Posted January 29, 2009 Share Posted January 29, 2009 I think I understand it. The fader movement is consistent, but when you're doing the stab part, you start with the record positioned a bit further back. You catch the tip of the sample going forward, but you've already closed the fader as it's on the way back because you're not going as far into the sample as you are with a chirp. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnny 1 move Posted January 30, 2009 Share Posted January 30, 2009 I think I understand it. The fader movement is consistent, but when you're doing the stab part, you start with the record positioned a bit further back. You catch the tip of the sample going forward, but you've already closed the fader as it's on the way back because you're not going as far into the sample as you are with a chirp. What I was trying to say is that with a chirp you open the fader as you start going back, you click exactly on the turn, so if you want to hide the backwards part you need to either pull it back out of the sample before you open again or keep the fader closed until you're back out of the sample. Kind of the same thing looked at from a different angle. If Ryan was as good at explaining cuts as he is at continental toasting techniques we'd know if we're all talking about the same thing or not... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wax On Posted January 30, 2009 Share Posted January 30, 2009 Really? Things like this happen to me all the time. I thought i invented the delayed 2clicker, scratch drumming, and sticker looping. I thought i invented flipping the bird and wireless networking. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan Posted January 30, 2009 Author Share Posted January 30, 2009 I think I understand it. The fader movement is consistent, but when you're doing the stab part, you start with the record positioned a bit further back. You catch the tip of the sample going forward, but you've already closed the fader as it's on the way back because you're not going as far into the sample as you are with a chirp. Exactly! Thank you steve. *edit i should be banned from this section. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnny 1 move Posted January 30, 2009 Share Posted January 30, 2009 I think I understand it. The fader movement is consistent, but when you're doing the stab part, you start with the record positioned a bit further back. You catch the tip of the sample going forward, but you've already closed the fader as it's on the way back because you're not going as far into the sample as you are with a chirp. Exactly! Thank you steve. *edit i should be banned from this section. The bit I don't get is that a chirp is mirrored around the click, if you start pulling backwards and open the fader at the same time then you will hear something. That's why I think you must be delaying opening the fader, even if it's only a teeny weeny delay... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan Posted January 30, 2009 Author Share Posted January 30, 2009 I think I understand it. The fader movement is consistent, but when you're doing the stab part, you start with the record positioned a bit further back. You catch the tip of the sample going forward, but you've already closed the fader as it's on the way back because you're not going as far into the sample as you are with a chirp. Exactly! Thank you steve. *edit i should be banned from this section. The bit I don't get is that a chirp is mirrored around the click, if you start pulling backwards and open the fader at the same time then you will hear something. That's why I think you must be delaying opening the fader, even if it's only a teeny weeny delay... What does it matter dood? you already said in yer first post you can do it!This back and forth of us not understanding each other is pretty pointless. Now lets just cyber high 5 and forget about it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnny 1 move Posted January 30, 2009 Share Posted January 30, 2009 I think I understand it. The fader movement is consistent, but when you're doing the stab part, you start with the record positioned a bit further back. You catch the tip of the sample going forward, but you've already closed the fader as it's on the way back because you're not going as far into the sample as you are with a chirp. Exactly! Thank you steve. *edit i should be banned from this section. The bit I don't get is that a chirp is mirrored around the click, if you start pulling backwards and open the fader at the same time then you will hear something. That's why I think you must be delaying opening the fader, even if it's only a teeny weeny delay... What does it matter dood? you already said in yer first post you can do it!This back and forth of us not understanding each other is pretty pointless. Now lets just cyber high 5 and forget about it It sounds better when you do it,.. now shut up and help me bite you Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
airnino Posted January 30, 2009 Share Posted January 30, 2009 *edit i should be banned from this section. signed! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.