Flare Bear Posted February 11, 2005 Share Posted February 11, 2005 http://www.djdeals.com/stantonSA5.htm think it looks ugly as fuck Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mixologist Posted February 11, 2005 Share Posted February 11, 2005 They redeisgned the face plater on their old mixer? The only thing i hate now, it that new Stanton logo, i liked they're old "S" that new one looks shit. Also why the fuck could they not make the mixer symmetrical, i don't mind the colors, but not having it symmetrical annoys me. i sitll like the grey and blue colors though. Oh well, maybe this makes the sa-8 cheaper, i wans an sa-8 so abd, or a 707 whatever is cheaper Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimmy Posted February 11, 2005 Share Posted February 11, 2005 ohhh errr i got a SA8, but thats half broke now...i find its best to stick with simple layouts, easier when ur in a rush i strongly recommend the eclar series' Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Posted February 11, 2005 Share Posted February 11, 2005 I think it looks alright. It would look better if the silver part extended to the other fader top left too so it was more symetrical. Either way, it's a good mixer. I had a go on Dub's and I really liked it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dub-Se7en Posted February 12, 2005 Share Posted February 12, 2005 let's hope the paint finish is better less than1 year old. fuckin awesome mixer though. love it.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Deeswift Posted February 12, 2005 Share Posted February 12, 2005 http://www.djdeals.com/stantonSA5.htm think it looks ugly as fuck<{POST_SNAPBACK}> I like it! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flare Bear Posted February 12, 2005 Author Share Posted February 12, 2005 i just meant i liked it better with the s logo like mix said and the stripes. and damn se7en! i thought the marks on the 07 ISP mixer that Q used on the diy vid were bad haha Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mixologist Posted February 12, 2005 Share Posted February 12, 2005 yea the New stanton logo is just to gay looking, i wonder who stanton fired because everything they've done has changed ever since we lsot the forum, maybe some new bosss... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Deeswift Posted February 12, 2005 Share Posted February 12, 2005 I like the logo better than the old one. Hated the old one, in fact. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dj_impact Posted February 12, 2005 Share Posted February 12, 2005 not to fond of the new look aye, like the old one better. Dope mixer to scratch with tho Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FlipFlop Posted February 12, 2005 Share Posted February 12, 2005 the fuck..lmao...how in the hell does your hand go all over the place on the mixer like that?!?! lmao....you must go buck wild with the fader. let's hope the paint finish is better less than1 year old. fuckin awesome mixer though. love it....<{POST_SNAPBACK}> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phontic Posted February 12, 2005 Share Posted February 12, 2005 let's hope the paint finish is better less than1 year old. fuckin awesome mixer though. love it....<{POST_SNAPBACK}> How did you manage that? I Scratch on mine for a couple of hours every day and mine looks just like new. Got it for 6 months. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clownstyle Posted February 12, 2005 Share Posted February 12, 2005 Whats the price tag on that mixer? Looks too cheap!! I prefer my hak360 anyday Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Posted February 12, 2005 Share Posted February 12, 2005 I'm not all that bothered about how equipment looks. If I could buy high quality turntables that never skipped, I wouldn't care if they looked like shit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flowerpot Posted February 12, 2005 Share Posted February 12, 2005 that seems to be the mixers fault all thaat rubbing off,they probly used sum different or new stuff cos i have a sk2fltd for like 2 years or so and its emacualte condition Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phology Posted February 12, 2005 Share Posted February 12, 2005 (edited) i think this mixer looks tacky and boring Edited February 12, 2005 by Dj Phology Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimmy Posted February 12, 2005 Share Posted February 12, 2005 (edited) i just prefer the old stanton full stop.the old logo etc were much better but i spose it all comes down to personal taste and shit good performance from it tho " prefer my hak360 anyday " exactly Edited February 12, 2005 by nin-jazz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
milk Posted February 12, 2005 Share Posted February 12, 2005 New colour scheme is nice.New logo is nasty. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mixologist Posted February 12, 2005 Share Posted February 12, 2005 that seems to be the mixers fault all thaat rubbing off,they probly used sum different or new stuff cos i have a sk2fltd for like 2 years or so and its emacualte condition<{POST_SNAPBACK}> me too unfortunately i'm still using the gay FFV2, i haven't put a PNG in ye Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
$a!n+ Posted February 12, 2005 Share Posted February 12, 2005 i thinkit looks clean. But why do they put the trims on the back? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flare Bear Posted February 12, 2005 Author Share Posted February 12, 2005 i think the sa3 looks pretty good though, kinda ecler-ish http://www.djdeals.com/stantonSA3.htm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dub-Se7en Posted February 12, 2005 Share Posted February 12, 2005 i thinkit looks clean. But why do they put the trims on the back? it's an extra phono gain control, so you can balance the output volume between the line in and phono channels. fuckin essential if you run programs like final scratch and want an equal volume output when you are switching between inputs. the master trim allows you to use the master volume like an upfader and cut with it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alkatrazz Posted February 13, 2005 Share Posted February 13, 2005 those sa-3's look super clean.. I wonder what there flagship scratch mixer is going to be? I doubt the sa-5 , or maybe i dunno Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimmy Posted February 13, 2005 Share Posted February 13, 2005 SA3 is better than the SA5, as in eye pleasing etc some ppl may be lovin the new stanton, but its just not for me Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mixologist Posted February 13, 2005 Share Posted February 13, 2005 those sa-3's look super clean.. I wonder what there flagship scratch mixer is going to be? I doubt the sa-5 , or maybe i dunno<{POST_SNAPBACK}> the sa-5 has been there only recent scratch mixer, really it'd be interesting to see what they have come up with though for this year or next year something has to be in the works... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.