djdiggla Posted April 28, 2009 Share Posted April 28, 2009 Foly, u might really dig this!http://www.gigacrate.com/Blog/?p=727 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Giraffe Dung Posted April 28, 2009 Share Posted April 28, 2009 this is amazing and could actually work as super high resolution hid. imagine a box with a platter and a capture device inside it, which is capturing the underside of the platter as it moves. as long as the capture rate was at least, say, 180fps and the resolution was... well vga would give you over 1500 positions on the circumference i suppose, it could track the movement of the platter better than timecode. i have no idea what's easier on a computer to process, audio or video input, especially at high levels... maybe it's not worth it and audio timecode is always going to be better. i presume, although really i have no idea about this stuff, that it would take less bandwidth to send 240fps @ 520x520 than it would to send standard 1080p hd... if this sounds like it would work then i've copyrighted it, otherwise just ignore me Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mattnice Posted April 28, 2009 Share Posted April 28, 2009 that sounds and looks like shit Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mattnice Posted April 28, 2009 Share Posted April 28, 2009 have u seen the iphone thing as well Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
djdiggla Posted April 28, 2009 Author Share Posted April 28, 2009 What do u care, quitter? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
djfoly Posted April 28, 2009 Share Posted April 28, 2009 this is amazing and could actually work as super high resolution hid. imagine a box with a platter and a capture device inside it, which is capturing the underside of the platter as it moves. as long as the capture rate was at least, say, 180fps and the resolution was... well vga would give you over 1500 positions on the circumference i suppose, it could track the movement of the platter better than timecode. i have no idea what's easier on a computer to process, audio or video input, especially at high levels... maybe it's not worth it and audio timecode is always going to be better. i presume, although really i have no idea about this stuff, that it would take less bandwidth to send 240fps @ 520x520 than it would to send standard 1080p hd... if this sounds like it would work then i've copyrighted it, otherwise just ignore me sometimes you make me feel really sad chris! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
djfoly Posted April 28, 2009 Share Posted April 28, 2009 Foly, u might really dig this!http://www.gigacrate.com/Blog/?p=727 eh..............I might kill myself tonight! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mattnice Posted April 28, 2009 Share Posted April 28, 2009 shoot dirk first Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
d00ban Posted April 28, 2009 Share Posted April 28, 2009 lol you gotta give it to some people, they work hard - shame they aint got no good ideas Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Giraffe Dung Posted April 28, 2009 Share Posted April 28, 2009 other application for this: realtime audio manipulation via dance and drama. on my first idea the platter could be transparent and the record on top could be tracked. how does the cdx (and denon spinning platter, ns7, etc) work? i suppose this whole approach isn't worth pursuing if there's a mechanical way to do this, and presumably there is hence aforementioned products existing. but there *are* applications for this technology, you bunch of naysayers. ps foly you *are* sad. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mattnice Posted April 29, 2009 Share Posted April 29, 2009 ooh harsh words i see a cyber fight happening Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
djfoly Posted April 29, 2009 Share Posted April 29, 2009 other application for this: realtime audio manipulation via dance and drama. on my first idea the platter could be transparent and the record on top could be tracked. how does the cdx (and denon spinning platter, ns7, etc) work? i suppose this whole approach isn't worth pursuing if there's a mechanical way to do this, and presumably there is hence aforementioned products existing. but there *are* applications for this technology, you bunch of naysayers. ps foly you *are* sad. whats the POOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOINT you can already scratch on RECORDS!!!!! you dont see folk trying to invent a light powered double bass do you. im all for innovation but there really does have to be a point. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Giraffe Dung Posted April 29, 2009 Share Posted April 29, 2009 well, yeah, theremins? you just got zinged blard. the application doesn't have to be totally scratch centric though- like i said it'd be cool to see a group of people dancing from one side of a stage to another with a realtime sound effect each, perhaps they're all wearing different colours so they can get tracked... but even that's not the point. og man probably argued they already had wood and shit when the stone age first came around, and that they already had stone when the bronze age came around, and all the other ages that i would know if i was like, into history and shit. in the grand scheme of things, what's the point of anything? we're all gonna die... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
djfoly Posted April 29, 2009 Share Posted April 29, 2009 well, yeah, theremins? you just got zinged blard. the application doesn't have to be totally scratch centric though- like i said it'd be cool to see a group of people dancing from one side of a stage to another with a realtime sound effect each, perhaps they're all wearing different colours so they can get tracked... but even that's not the point. og man probably argued they already had wood and shit when the stone age first came around, and that they already had stone when the bronze age came around, and all the other ages that i would know if i was like, into history and shit. in the grand scheme of things, what's the point of anything? we're all gonna die... I dont understand any of this stuff. all i know is electric guitars are cool but so is the acoustic......with these two amazing inventions isthere any need for a laserrobocomputerultramagneticradioactive guitar? I say no but you go ahead and do what you want! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wax On Posted April 29, 2009 Share Posted April 29, 2009 80's technology FTW Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
djdiggla Posted April 29, 2009 Author Share Posted April 29, 2009 other application for this: realtime audio manipulation via dance and drama. on my first idea the platter could be transparent and the record on top could be tracked. how does the cdx (and denon spinning platter, ns7, etc) work? i suppose this whole approach isn't worth pursuing if there's a mechanical way to do this, and presumably there is hence aforementioned products existing. but there *are* applications for this technology, you bunch of naysayers. ps foly you *are* sad. whats the POOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOINT you can already scratch on RECORDS!!!!! you dont see folk trying to invent a light powered double bass do you. im all for innovation but there really does have to be a point. I would like a virtual MPC well, yeah, theremins? you just got zinged blard. the application doesn't have to be totally scratch centric though- like i said it'd be cool to see a group of people dancing from one side of a stage to another with a realtime sound effect each, perhaps they're all wearing different colours so they can get tracked... but even that's not the point. og man probably argued they already had wood and shit when the stone age first came around, and that they already had stone when the bronze age came around, and all the other ages that i would know if i was like, into history and shit. in the grand scheme of things, what's the point of anything? we're all gonna die... No guitar is cool. </fact> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
djfoly Posted April 29, 2009 Share Posted April 29, 2009 no one was talking to you dirk! check the sample for I used to love her by common sense i cant remember who its by but if you dont think its cool you might as well be listening to the pussy cat dolls.........doll! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
djfoly Posted April 29, 2009 Share Posted April 29, 2009 no one was talking to you dirk! check the sample for I used to love her by common sense i cant remember who its by but if you dont think its cool you might as well be listening to the pussy cat dolls.........doll! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mattnice Posted April 29, 2009 Share Posted April 29, 2009 clungetastic Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.