Bubba Posted June 10, 2006 Author Share Posted June 10, 2006 Bitrate don't matter? I've got all my shiz as mp3s...so that would be hella dope... Ttm 57 - I know it's pretty dope, but still, I think it looks sooooooooooooooooooo ugly especially if you compare it with the 08....So I'm not too sure if I'm gonna buy any mixer. The other thing is, that if I want to go play in a club, I'd have to bring my ttm with me and re-cable their whole soundsystem cause teh converting-box-thingy is built into the mixer. Now consideirng that I play in clubs - I'd preffer just to have to use the standard mixer there (here in Switzerland almost always a pioneer) and just have to do the re-cabling of the turntables...ya get me? That's sorta what I view as a downside on the ttm57...but please, correct me if I'm wrong. pee.z Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ripple Posted June 10, 2006 Share Posted June 10, 2006 Well you can still connect it as a SL1 it seems. Don't ask how, but it should be possible somehow. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smyrx Posted June 10, 2006 Share Posted June 10, 2006 get serato and youll never have to buy vinyl again.. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Why wouldn't you want to buy vinyl?? I still think nothing compares to vinyl, but SSL is a bomb tool... I love it cause 1) you don't have to tranport crates of recs and 2) it's about $2,500 cheaper than the crappiest vinyl press. BUT, I'm not too into juggling with it... prefer the real deal.<{POST_SNAPBACK}> man i had no problems with juggling w/ serato. i think it makes it easier because it takes less time switch and cue the second record, just click a button and your there, a juggler's dream. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ripple Posted June 11, 2006 Share Posted June 11, 2006 ^Not to mention no skipping in relative mode. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smyrx Posted June 11, 2006 Share Posted June 11, 2006 word Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon Posted June 11, 2006 Share Posted June 11, 2006 ^Not to mention no skipping in relative mode.<{POST_SNAPBACK}> yeh , last house party i played there was creaky floorboards so the everytime someone came too near the needle would slide along the whole record Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OUTERSPACE Posted June 18, 2006 Share Posted June 18, 2006 It is easy to install and easy to use. It depends on your configuration, for mine P4 2.8ghz. 512 ram it works flawless. When i set it to buffer 5 I can even play an instrumentall on Cubase and record with Cubase the scratches from serato without pops and crackless sound. btw I'm very happy that I sold my Final Scratch make a conclusion for yourself. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon Posted June 18, 2006 Share Posted June 18, 2006 When i set it to buffer 5 I can even play an instrumentall on Cubase and record with Cubase the scratches from serato without pops and crackless sound. btw I'm very happy that I sold my Final Scratch make a conclusion for yourself.<{POST_SNAPBACK}> is that a laptop or desktop? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
$a!n+ Posted June 18, 2006 Share Posted June 18, 2006 Bitrate don't matter? I've got all my shiz as mp3s...so that would be hella dope... Ttm 57 - I know it's pretty dope, but still, I think it looks sooooooooooooooooooo ugly especially if you compare it with the 08....So I'm not too sure if I'm gonna buy any mixer. The other thing is, that if I want to go play in a club, I'd have to bring my ttm with me and re-cable their whole soundsystem cause teh converting-box-thingy is built into the mixer. Now consideirng that I play in clubs - I'd preffer just to have to use the standard mixer there (here in Switzerland almost always a pioneer) and just have to do the re-cabling of the turntables...ya get me? That's sorta what I view as a downside on the ttm57...but please, correct me if I'm wrong. pee.z<{POST_SNAPBACK}> EXACTLY! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OUTERSPACE Posted June 24, 2006 Share Posted June 24, 2006 When i set it to buffer 5 I can even play an instrumentall on Cubase and record with Cubase the scratches from serato without pops and crackless sound. btw I'm very happy that I sold my Final Scratch make a conclusion for yourself.<{POST_SNAPBACK}> is that a laptop or desktop?<{POST_SNAPBACK}>It's an HP nx9010 laptop p4 2.8ghz 40gb 512 ram + Lacie firewire hdd and M-Audio Firewire Audiophile Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D-Phy Posted June 26, 2006 Share Posted June 26, 2006 I got serato 1.5 a few weeks ago, its pretty dope. Although I find that scratching/juggling on Serato is slightly delayed, especially for faster chirps/chirp flares etc. Its like a milisecond out of time. Anyone else find any scratch/delay related problems? Im using my desktop computer at the moment, 1GB Ram, 2.21 Ghz....However I used it on a mates apple laptop and it seemed to be a bit more accurate? :s Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.